Hinkefent v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county with the offense of driving a motor vehicle'while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, was tried before a jury, found guilty and his punishment assessed at a fine of $125.
Counsel for defendant, in his statement of facts, sets out:
“The plaintiff in error, a young man, worked on a farm, ranch near Collins-ville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. He had supper on that Saturday night with the family of his young lady friend; after supper they drove to a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Moon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1956
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- Romjue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962