Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 1, 1956No. A-12315PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWELL, Judge.

Roy William Armstrong, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged by information filed in' the county court of Okmulgee County with the offense of operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; was tried before a jury, convicted, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for ten days. When advised by the court that they would also be required to fix a fine in connection therewith, the jury retired and added a “$25.00 fine.” 47 O.S.A. § 93.

In his brief defendant says that the case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Lombness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Logan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Hinkefent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Starrett v. Midwest CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API