Legal Opinion
State v. Drew
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1910No. Nos. 16,383—(19)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Tbe defendant was convicted in tbe district court for Ramsey county upon an indictment under R. L. 1905, § 5118, charging bim with receiving a deposit in bis private bank, tbe Bank of Hamline, while he well knew that he was insolvent. His motion for a new trial was denied, Olin B. Lewis, J. He was then sentenced to two years’ imprisonment at hard labor. From the judgment entered thereon, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Appellant, Arthur Z. Drew, was tried and convicted under an indictment reading as follows:
“The said Arthur Z. Drew, on the 15th day of January, A. D. 1908, at the city of St. Paul, in said county, then and there being engaged in and doing a private banking business, and was then and there, to wit, on the 15th day of January 1908, at the city of St. Paul, in said county, engaged in and doing business as a private banker under the style and name of Bank of Hamline, and he, the said Arthur Z. Drew, did then and there, as such private banker, wrongfully, unlawfully, and feloniously accept and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- United States v. EdgertonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Czarlinsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Boswell v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State ex rel. Sandquist v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.