Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. Mills-Winfield Engineering Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant contends the parol evidence rulé conflicts with the trial court’s finding of an express warranty on the capacity of a cement unloading machine. We agree and reverse. As a consequence, we do not reach the question of sufficiency of the evidence on the express warranty nor the conflicting claims of the parties regarding damages.
FACTS
Respondent Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc., a cement plant operator, entered into an agreement to lease an unloading machine from appellant Cyclonaire, Corp. which manufactures systems used to transport products, such as cement, from one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Material Movers, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Karger v. WangerinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Maurice Sunderland Architecture, Inc. v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. TempWorks Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- TRIPLE B & G, INC. v. City of FairmontCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third partyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.