Legal Opinion

Kapuscianski v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1927No. Appeals, 144 and 145PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellant operated a colliery at Mt. Carmel. The coal mined and prepared was placed in a building containing pockets from which it was loaded into trucks and wagons by means of chutes. The building was located about seventy-five (75) feet from the colliery. Appellant also provided, for the use of coal haulers, a road leading from the public highway over its property to the chutes. Appellee’s son, a customer who purchased coal from defendant, took his truck, in December, 1924, to the colliery for a load of coal. As there was a heavy demand for coal that day, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Fredericks v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Ferry v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Tucker v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Potter Title and Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Skeen Et Vir v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Saganowich v. HachikianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Giordano v. Clement Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API