Legal Opinion
Gastelum v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 20, 2023No. 1:21-cv-01740Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1740 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION ) TO DISMISS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 13 v. ) PLEADINGS ) 14 KOHL’S INC., ) (Doc. 23) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 17 Fernando Gastelum asserts Kohl’s Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and 18 California law by not having accessible features in stores its located in Bakersfield and El Centro, 19 California. (Doc. 20.) Defendant1 seeks judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the 20 Federal…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.