Legal Opinion
Gastelum v. HEES II
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 28, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01337Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21-cv-1337 JLS (RBB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: (1) GRANTING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT 14 HEES II, d/b/a Big 5 Sporting Goods – WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR San Diego, 15 COSTS; AND (2) DISMISSING Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 16 WITHOUT PREJUDICE 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 18 [ECF Nos. 1, 2] 19 20 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum’s Complaint (“Compl.,” 21 ECF No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.