Legal Opinion

Tandy v. City of Wichita

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2004No. 02-3329, 02-3340PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs-appellants Betty Allen, Victor Beltz, Jo Ann Donnell, Jeff Farney, 1 Ron Garnett, Mike Goupil, and Carolyn Jeffries (collectively “appellants”) sued, alongside Sylvia Tandy, Naomi Passman, and Joel Goertz (collectively “cross-appellees”), defendant-appellee City of Wichita (“Wichita”) in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. Wichita operates the Wichita Metropolitan Transit Authority (“Wichita Transit”). Appellants alleged violations of 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Rehabilitation Act”) and of Title II of the Americans with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SwensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Joe Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. DG Ex Rel. Stricklin v. DeVaughnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Lippoldt v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API