Legal Opinion
Easterling v. State of Connecticut
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 5, 2011No. Civil Action 3:08-CV-0826 (JCH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 106) AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 113)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2004, the plaintiff, Cherie Easterling, applied to work as a Correction Officer (“CO”) with the defendant, State of Connecticut Department of Correction (the “DOC”). Easterling brings this action on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated applicants against the DOC, asserting that the DOC violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”), by using an employment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- EEOC v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Bauer v. HolderDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Martinez v. Connecticut Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Davis v. Connecticut Department of Administrative ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Hare v. David S. Brown EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.