Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Connecticut Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 28, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-cv-00778 (MPS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Michael P. Shea, United States District Judge

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs Eduardo Martinez and Phillip Browne allege that they were victims of employment discrimination on the basis of race and national origin during their time as correctional officers at the Central Transportation Unit (“CTU”) of the State of Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC”), the defendant in this case. They claim that they were denied two opportunities to be promoted to lieutenant in a manner that constituted disparate treatment and also has a disparate impact on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Office of State ComptrollerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  2. Brown v. Office of the State ComptrollerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  3. Gale v. BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  4. Praver v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API