Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Holder

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided June 10, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-cv-93PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.

At issue on cross-motions for summary judgment in this Title VII1 case is whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) gender-normed physical fitness test (“PFT”) that all FBI New Agent Trainees (“NATs”) must pass constitutes impermissible disparate treatment under Title VII. As a NAT, plaintiff failed to perform the 30 push-ups required for male NATs, and argues that this requirement, given that female NATs are required to perform only 14 push-ups, discriminates against him on the basis of sex and thus violates Title VII. Defendant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jay Bauer v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. Allen v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  3. Amer Rizvi v. Loudoun County School Board, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  4. Appleton v. Orange County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  5. Bauer v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API