Bauer v. Holder
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
At issue on cross-motions for summary judgment in this Title VII1 case is whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) gender-normed physical fitness test (“PFT”) that all FBI New Agent Trainees (“NATs”) must pass constitutes impermissible disparate treatment under Title VII. As a NAT, plaintiff failed to perform the 30 push-ups required for male NATs, and argues that this requirement, given that female NATs are required to perform only 14 push-ups, discriminates against him on the basis of sex and thus violates Title VII. Defendant…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jay Bauer v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Allen v. Baltimore CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Amer Rizvi v. Loudoun County School Board, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
- Appleton v. Orange County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
- Bauer v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.