Davis v. Connecticut Department of Administrative Services
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Denisha Davis (“Davis”), brings disparate impact and disparate treatment claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e) et seq. (“Title VII”). The defendants, the State of Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC”) and State of Connecticut Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”), have moved to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is being granted.
I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Davis applied to DOC for the position of Correctional Officer (“CO”) in 2006. At that time,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Myers v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024