Legal Opinion

Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. Farwell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1942No. Civil No. 4442PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, C. J.-

— Cyrus Farwell, plaintiff, brought suit against Ben Heney to quiet title to certain mining claims as against all persons, except the United States of America, and to secure a restraining order prohibiting Heney from interfering with plaintiff’s use of the claims. Answer was duly filed by Heney, and thereafter Swisshelm Gold Silver Company, a corporation, intervener, asked leave to file an answer and cross complaint in intervention. The motion was granted and the answer and cross complaint duly filed. Intervener asked leave to bring in 0. Reynolds and Willie Fullinwider as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Beltran v. RollArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Collister v. Inter-State Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Garden Development Co. v. CarlawArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. MoseleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. TapoArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hendrie Buick Company v. MacKArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Marsh v. RiskasArizona Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API