Legal Opinion

Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1956No. 6114PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Southern Pacific Company, Inc., and Lewis V. Trosper and George Klenner, employees of the Southern Pacific Company, Inc., and from an order of the trial court denying plaintiffs’ motion for new trial.

The plaintiff, Hattie Wolfswinkel, as administratrix of the estate of Clarence *305Wolfswinkel, deceased, brought this action against the above named defendants for damages for the alleged negligent killing, in a railroad crossing accident, of the decedent who was her husband. The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Herzberg v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. ConwellArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Humphrey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Dennis v. StukeyArizona Supreme Court · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Trojanovich v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Di Orio v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. City of Phoenix v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API