Legal Opinion

Clifton Whidbee v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2017No. 14-36094PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Clifton Whidbee challenges the district court’s dismissal of his federal civil rights and state negligence claims against defendants Pierce County and Pierce County Sheriffs Deputy Eugene Allen. We affirm. The period of time during which 'Whidbee could commence these claims expired under a state statute of limitations before defendants removed the action to federal court, and the federal rules allowing additional time to effect service of process on defendants following removal do not extend or revive a state statute of limitations.

I

Under Washington law, an action…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Altera Corp. v. CirCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. James H. Wilson, III v. Hearos, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
  3. (PS) Bernard v. Freedom Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Acedo Peralta v. Quality Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Adams v. Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API