Legal Opinion

Adams v. Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 15, 2024No. 3:23-cv-01220Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Alysha ADAMS, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-1220-AGS-DDL 4 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 5 v. REMAND (ECF 7) AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 2) 6 GROSSMONT CUYAMACA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, 7 et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiffs sued their community-college employers over COVID-19 vaccine 11 mandates. The defense removed the case here, and plaintiffs now seek remand back to state 12 court. The defense meanwhile moves to dismiss based on mootness and failure to state a 13 claim. 14 BACKGROUND 15 This case’s 31…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API