Legal Opinion
Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized Technology
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1988No. 87-5911PublishedCited by 469 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc. (“Eclat”) appeals the district court’s refusal to vacate a default judgment entered against it in favor of Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. (DMS). We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Eclat, a California corporation, sells a device that reduces energy consumption of home appliances. According to DMS, Eclat is associated with Computerized Technology (CT), a California partnership. DMS also claims that CT was to be a retailer of Eclat’s product and that it was its “understanding” that CT was “part of Eclat and that in operating the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jose Luis Pena v. Seguros La Comercial, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by469 opinions
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of MesleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Internet Solutions for Business Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum Exporting CountriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Karen L. Edwards v. Occidental Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.