Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 7, 1976No. C 75-241PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING THE NRAB AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS XO DISMISS
ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge.
Background and Arguments
Both of the defendants in the above-entitled case have filed motions to dismiss and all of the parties have filed extensive materials in support of their respective positions. Oral arguments were heard on March 29, 1976. On May 14,1976, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and a stipulation was filed by counsel stating that the court could rule on the summary judgment motion without further briefing or argument. The court has examined the filed materials,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fong v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Sheehan v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978