Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1978No. 76-2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant Sheehan, a discharged employee of the Union Pacific Railroad, filed an action in the trial court to set aside or reverse a decision of the National Railroad Adjustment Board which had denied him a hearing on his discharge. The trial court treated defendants’ motions as motions for summary judgment and granted them. The court thus did not disturb the Board’s decision on the basis that the Board had jurisdiction to enter the order it did.
The facts are set out by the district court in Sheehan v. Union Pacific R.R., 423 F.Supp. 324, and need not be repeated here.
However, two…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael G. Radin v. United States of America and National Mediation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Sheehan v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County RailroadDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1981
- Adamczewski v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Mitchell, George v. Union PacificCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005