Legal Opinion

Olen C. FAULK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Howard Jewett, Albert Nelson and Edward Hanna, Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 1984No. 83-3485PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, Olen C. Faulk challenges the dismissal of his pro se complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Construing his pleadings liberally, we conclude that although he failed to state a claim against the individual defendants, he succeeded in stating claims against the City of Orlando under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of his complaint with respect to the City.

I. BACKGROUND

Appellant, a white male, was employed by the City of Orlando Waste Water and Sanitation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  2. Cummings v. Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
  3. Aleman v. StateDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
  4. Tuma v. Dade County Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  5. Campbell v. DeeringDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API