Heri v. Fritz Companies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.
This ease comes before the Court on Defendant Fritz Companies, Inc.’s Motion in Limine [17-1]. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion in Limine [17-1], The Court FINDS: (1) that if the alleged damage occurred during the period when the furniture was loaded onto the vessel until the carrier completed unloading, COGSA applies and COGSA limits Defendant’s liability to $500.00 per package; and (2) that if the alleged damage occurred after the unloading of the furniture, the Harter Act applies to the case at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. M/v Peisander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Caterpillar Americas Company v. SS Sea RoadsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1964
- Pan-Am Trade & Credit Corp. v. the CampfireCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Insurance Co. of North America v. M/V Ocean LynxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jagenberg, Inc. v. Georgia Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Armco Chile Prodein, S.A. v. The M/V NorlandiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Jones v. Compagnie Generale MaritimeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Realini v. Contship Containerlines, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999