Legal Opinion
Armco Chile Prodein, S.A. v. The M/V Norlandia
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 27, 1995No. 90-1081-Civ-J-20PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
SCHLESINGER, District Judge.
Trial in this cause was held before the undersigned. Based on the testimony and evidence received during trial, and the applicable legal standards, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs, Armco Chile Prodein, S.A. (“Armeo”) and Compañía De Seguros Cruz Del Sur, S.A. (“Cruz”), are suing the M/V Norlandia, in rem, and Scheepvaartmij Antigua (“Antigua”), in personam. This is an admiralty and maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h) of the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Nichimen Company, Inc. v. M. v. Farland, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Vigra, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees v. Seaboard Shipping Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Guideone Elite Insurance v. Old Cutler Presbyterian Church, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Voltaire v. Home Services Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Kelso Enterprises, Ltd. v. M/V WISIDA FROSTDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Armco Chile v. M/v NorlandiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Atwood Oceanics, Inc. v. M/V PAC AltairDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2016