Legal Opinion

Jones v. Compagnie Generale Maritime

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided April 4, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 494-150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court is a motion by Defendant Compagnie Generale Maritime (“CGM”) for summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages. For reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion.

I

The purpose of summary judgment is to explore the evidence and determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact requiring a trial. Matsushita Elec. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Summary judgment is granted when no such issue is discovered and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Great…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ceh, Inc. v. F/v Seafarer (On 675048)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. ETS Gustave Brunet, S.A. v. M.V. "Nedlloyd Rosario"District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  3. Ceh, Inc. v. FCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API