Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Alford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1959No. 38403Published

1DissentBerry, Justice

I am unable to agree with the majority-opinion.

This appeal is from order of trial court denying plaintiff in error’s exception and objection to the report of Commissioners appointed under 66 O.S.19S1 § 53, in a reverse condemnation proceeding. In Consolidated Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Roberts, 40 Okl. 304, 137 P. 1179, we held in the first paragraph of the syllabus that “an order of the district court overruling a motion to dismiss is not reviewable in the Supreme Court until a final judgment has been rendered in the case.” See also City of Eufaula v. Ahrens, 58 Okl. 180, 159 P. 327. The cited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hawks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Grand River Dam Authority v. MisenhimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Deetz v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. City of Eufaula v. AhrensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. CO. v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API