Legal Opinion
Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Connellee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 5, 1932No. 20814PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
This is an action in the district court of Oklahoma county by C. U. Oonnellee against the Commercial Casualty Insurance Company to reform a theft insurance policy and to recover the sum of $106.40 because of loss by theft of 15 dresses. The defense was that the loss was not covered by the terms of the policy, and that plaintiff was not entitled to have the policy reformed. The trial was to the court, and resulted in judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant has appealed and asserts that the judgment is contrary to law and is not sustained by the evidence.
The policy in question is a resident…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Back v. Peoples National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Journal Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Robinson v. Union Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
- Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. CeaphusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gentry v. American Motorist Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Ohio Casualty Ins. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Mike Occhiato Mercantile Co. v. Allemannia Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. VarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.