Legal Opinion
Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Varner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 25, 1932No. 21427PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action to recover on an accident insurance policy. The petition is in two counts, the second count being for reformation of the policy.
Plaintiff prays for a judgment in the sum of $500 for the loss of one eye, that being the amount of indemnity provided for in the policy for the accidental loss of an eye.
Trial was had, resulting in a judgment reforming the policy and a directed verdict for.the plaintiff for the amount sued for.
The loss of plaintiff’s eye by an accidental injury is not questioned. There can he no doubt as to plaintiff’s right to recover if reformation of the policy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn, N.Y. v. CeaphusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. ConnelleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Peterson v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Fidelity-Phoenix Fire Ins. Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by9 opinions
- Business Interiors, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Ohio Casualty Ins. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Warner v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Atlas Life Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- British America Assur. Co. v. ShoresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.