Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Downer v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1937No. 33,398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

The state brought this action in mandamus to require the board of county commissioners of Kearny county to contribute to the cost of erecting a bridge across the Arkansas river. The bridge is a part of the north-and-south county-line highway between Kearny and Hamilton counties, although the situs of the highway where the bridge was erected was not exactly on the county line, but at some distance west of it. This latter fact, however, was merely due to engineering problems of highway and bridge construction in that locality.

In its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Kirkbride v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sublett v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Clackamas County, Ore. v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. Hill v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. Clackamas County v. MckayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API