Hill v. City of Lawrence
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C J.:
Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Justin D. Hill, Jr., brought this action in mandamus to compel the governing body of the City of Lawrence to open a portion of Broadview Drive, a platted street which dead-ends, at their property line. Alternatively they prayed for a declaratory judgment that they are entitled to use the street in its unopened state for vehicular access to their property. Certain landowners residing on the unopened street intervened, opposing plaintiffs’ position.
After a trial to the court the trial judge denied relief in mandamus and found plaintiffs had abandoned their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Dykes v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Grantham v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Pugh v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Ratley v. Sheriff's Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- Rodrock Enterprises, L.P. v. City of OlatheCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001