Legal Opinion
Migeot v. Barrilleaux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 1936No. 1592PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTT, Judge.
On February 20, 1936, we entered the following decree in this case in open court at Baton Rouge;
“Per Curiam.
“Following the course pursued by the Supreme Court in the case of McConnel v. Salmon, 174 La. 606, 141 So. 73, which case, like the present was one requiring a decision within twenty four hours after submission, we will, for the present assign oral reasons for judgment only and prepare and file written reasons at as early a date as possible.
“For the oral reasons assigned and for the written reasons to be hereafter filed,
“It is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hall v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- McConnell v. SalmonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Le Blanc v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Roussel v. DornierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Duplessis v. HarrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yuratich v. Plaquemines Parish Democratic Exec. Com.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Courtney v. SingletonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Sanders v. Twenty-Eighth Judicial Dist. Democratic Executive CommitteeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- State v. DuncanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
- Labouisse v. KoppelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.