Legal Opinion

Roussel v. Dornier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 11, 1912No. 19,318PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by Christopher Roussel for writs of 'mandamus and certiorari against Joseph B. Dornier and others.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Relator and three other citizens were candidates for the Democratic nomination for the office of sheriff of the parish of St. James.

Two of the candidates, Emile Dickey and Louis Le Bourgeois, withdrew as candidates for the office prior to the 23d day of January last. There remained two candidates— relator, Christopher Roussel, and Joseph B. Dornier.

The relator, Roussel, timely objected to the candidacy of the latter on the ground that he (Dornier) was a deputy registrar of voters in the actual exercise of the duties of that office, and as such officer was in control of the registration of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Irby v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. State ex rel. Barber v. Circuit Court for Marathon CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Long v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Lacombe v. LabordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API