Legal Opinion

Mayo v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided May 6, 2011No. 3-10-0997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TODD J. CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 25). For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.

FACTS

This case, filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), arises from certain actions and failures to act by employees at the Alvin C. York Veterans Administration Medical Facility in Murfreesboro, Tennessee (“York Facility”).

Plaintiff alleges that he underwent a colonoscopy procedure at the York Facility on November 16, 2006. Plaintiff claims that in February of 2009, he received a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Seavers v. Methodist Medical Center of Oak RidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Estate of Martha S. French v. Stratford HouseTennessee Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michael Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Stinnett v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2012
  3. Lataisha M. Jackson v. Charles Anthony BurrellTennessee Supreme Court · 2020
  4. SZYMBORSKI VS. SPRING MTN. TREATMENT CTR.Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. SZYMBORSKI VS. SPRING MTN. TREATMENT CTR.Nevada Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API