Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Hutchins
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Clay county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
On August 8, 1891, the defendant ordered from plaintiff a threshing-machine “outfit,” to be shipped for him to Fargo, on or about August 15, agreeing to receive the machine on arrival, •and settle for the purchase price, before delivery of the property, in •cash and notes secured by mortgage on the machine, the plaintiff to have the right to reject or cancel the order at any time before it delivered the goods. The plaintiff accepted the order, and so notified the defendant. If the machine had been shipped on or about August 15, it would have arrived at Fargo on or about August 17. As a matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bock v. HealyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
- Baldwin v. FarnsworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833
- Baker v. HendersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Medart Pulley Co. v. Dubuque Turbine & Roller Mill Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Interstate Engineering Co. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Oliver-Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. I. O. Teigen Construction Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
- White v. T. W. Little Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.