Legal Opinion
Oliver-Electrical Manufacturing Co. v. I. O. Teigen Construction Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1959No. 4-57-Civ.-7PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEVITT, Chief Judgé.
Plaintiff, a Michigan manufacturing corporation, instituted this action to recover $5,461.96, an unpaid balance due for goods sold and delivered. The defendant’s answer admits the sale and delivery and admits the failure to pay the sum in question. The answer alleges a counterclaim for damages by reason of the plaintiff’s failure to deliver the goods within the time agreed upon.
The defendant is an independent contractor engaged in the business of building electrical transmission lines. Early in 1956, defendant agreed to construct a transmission line for the Ottertail Power…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Liljengren Furniture & Lumber Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Gulf States Creosoting Co. v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Ohio Confection Co. v. Eimon Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Appliances, Inc. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. v. Iten Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Local 127, United Shoe Workers of America v. Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Local 127, United Shoe Workers Of America, Afl-Cio v. Brooks Shoe Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Clevenger Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Landmark Holding Co. v. WLW Real Estate, L.L.P. (In Re Landmark Holding Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.