Medart Pulley Co. v. Dubuque Turbine & Roller Mill Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — HoN. Fred O’DoN-NEL, Judge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
In the year 1K99 the defendant, having a contract for tbe erection of an electric light and power plant at Mauston, Wis., ordered certain materials and *245machinery from plaintiff, a company doing business in St. Louis. Plaintiff -undertook to fill the order within a certain limited period, but failed to do so until a considerably later date, by reason of which defendant claims to have been injured. This failure of 'plaintiff to perform its contract within the agreed time, and defendant’s claim for damage, .was the subject of considerable correspondence between the parties, defendant refusing to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CreightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Reid v. FieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Still v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Lufburrow v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- City of Muscatine v. Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Kaltoft v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Peuser v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Johnston v. GrimmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.