Legal Opinion
White v. T. W. Little Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1922No. 16939PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered May 12, 1921, upon sustaining demurrers to the complaint, dismissing an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— This action arose from the execution of two orders for the sale of two trucks and two trailers. A complaint, omitting the formal parts, was filed, in words as follows:
“That on the 22d day of June, 1920, the plaintiff *583made the following contract in writing for a truck and trailer:
“ ‘T. W. Little Co.,
Everett, Wash., U. S. A., 6/22, ’20.
Order No...................
Invoice No...................
Please enter my order for the following:
Quantity Model Description Price
One R Signal Trucks $5,800.00
One 7½ ton Trailer 1,750.00
If other trailer selected price to be arranged.
“ ‘To be delivered on arrival,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Radich v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Tripler v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Scholey v. . MumfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Buckley v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Shell Oil Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Shell Oil Co. v. Cy Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Jewell v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Interstate Engineering Co. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.