Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Celotex Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 3, 1989No. 62,113PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

This case was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas and comes before this court by certification pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, K.S.A. 60-3201 et seq. This court accepted certification, and the question as framed by the certifying order is:

Does the ten-year limitation of K.S.A. 60-513(b) apply to claims involving latent diseases and, if so, is it constitutional as applied to this plaintiff?

The plaintiff, Richard W. Tomlinson, filed this action on May 11, 1987. Based upon…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Schwartz v. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Gilger v. Lee Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API