Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 28, 2004No. 01-2018; A115934PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The state appeals from a judgment granting post-conviction relief to petitioner on the ground that his trial counsel provided constitutionally deficient representation in the course of advising him about his decision to plead guilty to two drug offenses. The state argues that petitioner’s trial counsel met his duty to provide adequate legal assistance regarding petitioner’s decision to plead guilty. We affirm.
Petitioner entered the United States in 1987 and has lived in Oregon since 1989. His three children, brother, and sister live in Oregon. Petitioner was charged in Oregon in 2000 with a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Ernesto Ibarra-GalindoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lyons v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ParedezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. PadillaKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FavelaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gonzalez v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CarlosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.