Legal Opinion
Miner v. Miner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 24, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The principal question in this case involved the validity of the delivery of a deed by the plaintiff’s decedent to the defendants. The case was tried by a state referee. The subordinate facts found by him support his conclusion that the deed was handed to one of the defendants “with the intent to deliver it and to transfer title to the property in question” to them. The judgment must stand unless it is vulnerable on procedural grounds.
The situation as reflected in the judgment is as follows: John F. Miner brought suit on August 8, 1946, to quiet the title to an interest in a piece of land in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kuehne v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Pierce v. PrescottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Rusch v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- State v. GoldbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Brill v. UlreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Town of West Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Goldblatt v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.