Legal Opinion

Brill v. Ulrey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 6, 1970PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.

The issue in this case is whether an executor may institute and maintain an action to quiet title to real estate where there is no allegation that the property involved is needed to satisfy claims against the estate.

The original complaint alleged that the plaintiffs, William H. Brill and Ann P. G-raham, were confirmed as executors by the Probate Court; that they were acting in that capacity; that they were in possession of three tracts of land belonging to their decedent, Sarah G-. Brill; and that the defendants claimed adverse interests in the land. The defendants demurred to the original…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. O'Connor v. ChiascioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Marquis v. DrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. LaFlamme v. DallessioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Burke v. AvitabileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API