Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle Mize
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises a variety of difficult questions under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Suing individually, as the representative of a class, and derivatively, Joe L. Smallwood, plaintiff-appellant, charged the defendants with a multitude of sins, including violations of the Proxy Rules, the tender offer provisions of the Williams Act, and Rule 10b-5. The defendants demanded a jury trial. After special issues were submitted to the jury and returned, the district court ruled that no violations of the securities laws had been established. We affirm.
I
FACTS
The story…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by238 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.