Bane v. Peerman
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. S. K. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Since this appeal was taken respondent, D. C. Bane, died, and Margaret E. Bane, administratrix of his estate, has been substituted hy this court as plaintiff and respondent.
This action is in claim and delivery. Findings and judgment *221were in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the judgment on the judgment-roll.
It is contended by appellant that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the findings are defective and do not support the judgment.
The complaint alleges: “That on the ninth day of July, 1896, said plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Truman v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Buckman v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bush v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.