Legal Opinion

Turner v. Angus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1906No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Ejectment by Henry Turner and another against James A. Angus and another. There was judgment for plaintiffs on a verdict directed by the court, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The accompanying plat will servé to show the premises in dispute. They are the land between the dotted and the dark lines and running easterly and westerly, in close proximity to each other, between the land marked “ Turner ” and “ Angus,” respectively. The action is ejectment, and plaintiffs recovered a verdict for the land between said lines, by direction of the court — and defendants have brought the cause to this court by writ of error.

In 1890 the premises now owned by both parties were included in lots 1 and 3, block 6, of Large’s Cable Road *680Addition to the city of Grand Rapids, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olin v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. De Long v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bauman v. BarendregtMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stolte v. Krentel.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Phelps v. BrevoortMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API