Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Barendregt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1930No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 34,798PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is a suit to restrain defendant from fishing and boating on Waldon lake in Kent county. Defendant claimed riparian rights, also title to a proportionate part of the bed of the lake, and had decree, affirming such title, on cross-bill.

Waldon lake is located wholly within the southwest quarter of section 5. In 1893, one Danforth owned all the land surrounding the lake, except at the extreme westerly end, and conveyed part of it to F. W. Wilbur under the following description:

“Beginning at the northwest corner of the east % of southwest quarter of section 5, town 6 north, range 10 west;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Rice v. RuddimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Gouverneur v. National Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co. v. South Grand Rapids Ice & Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Watson v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Burt v. MungerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Farabaugh v. RhodeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API