Legal Opinion

Bartram v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1923No. 24,080PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to determine interests in real estate, quiet title, and effect partition. The ultimate purpose was to compel remaindermen in fee after life estates to persons still living to abide by a voluntary partition of land by devisees under a will other than the remaindermen. The relief prayed for was denied, and the parties adverse to the remaindermen appeal.

David Bartram, a widower, and owner of 320 acres of land, died testate in 1889. He left ten children. He willed to each of eight of them an undivided one-tenth of the land. To…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Love v. BlauwSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Burgess v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Metcalfe v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ryan v. CullenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Lewis v. McConchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Robinson v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. North v. CoffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API