Legal Opinion

Metcalfe v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Bill for partition. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is a bill for partition.

Samuel Miller died in 1881, seised of certain real estate. He left a will, by which he devised to his “heirs at law, as the same would be -distributed by the law of descent of the State of Michigan as said law now is.” Decedent left a widow, but no issue. In the settlement of the estate, the interest of his widow, Mary A. Metcalfe, now the wife of complainant, and one of the defendants herein, was determined by the following order of the probate court:

“ That the use, net income, rents, and profits of the real estate, or interest therein, of which the said testator…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Albro v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Field v. LeiterWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Finch v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Farmers Bond & Mortgage Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API