Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Hixon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1907No. 14,879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Trego district court; James H. Reeder, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action in the district court from which this proceeding in error arises was one of ejectment. The land in controversy was state school-land. On June 16, 1885, it was sold to Maurice Walton, and a certificate of purchase was duly issued to him. On December 14, 1893, the state attempted to forfeit Walton’s contract. A notice of forfeiture was issued, which the sheriff served and returned. In the year 1903 the land was reappraised and sold to John Hixon, who entered into possession in January, 1904. In April, 1905, Walton quitclaimed his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spencer v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reitler v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Burgess v. HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Wichita Duntile Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Bartram v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Petersilie v. McLachlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API