Legal Opinion
Elmendorf Support Services Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 22, 2012No. 12-346CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the court’s bid protest jurisdiction. Plaintiff, the incumbent contractor to provide base supply services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richard-son Air Force Base, Alaska, asks the court to enjoin the Air Force from performing these services in-house. Although option years remain on the contract, the Air Force has notified plaintiff that when the latest option expires on June 29, 2012, the contract will not be renewed. Pending are plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction and defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) and (6)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elk Grove Unified School District v. NewdowSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dellew Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Red River Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Aircraft Charter Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- InSpace 21 LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.