Legal Opinion
Bugsy's, Inc. v. City of Myrtle Beach
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 24, 2000No. 25111PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
This action challenges the validity of Respondent the City of Myrtle Beach’s (the City’s) Zoning Ordinance 96-56 which, in part, affects some businesses which operate video poker machines. The master-in-equity determined Ordinance 96-56 was valid. Alternatively, the master-in-equity held appellants were operating in violation of the prior zoning ordinance. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Bugsy’s, Inc., is a sports bar and restaurant located within the City. Appellants King’s Highway Coffee, Inc., 6401 Convenience, Inc., and Candy Treats, Inc., are retail businesses located in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Martin v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Diamonds v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Centaur, Inc. v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sunset Cay, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Denene, Inc. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- RIVERWOODS, LLC v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Foothills Brewing Concern, Inc. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.