Legal Opinion
Reeves v. City of Burbank
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 3, 1979No. Civ. 55138PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.
By a first amended complaint, plaintiff Grace E. Reeves sought declaratory relief concerning the constitutionality of Burbank Ordinance No. 2354. Named as defendant was the City of Burbank, a municipal corporation.
Trial was by the court. The litigation arose because plaintiff Reeves owned two parcels of real property in Burbank, one on Angelino Avenue and one on Alameda Avenue. She wished to relocate the residential building on the Angelino parcel to the vacant lot on Alameda. The building on Angelino was a structure more than 15 years old. The Burbank ordinance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Madonna v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gassman v. Governing Board of Rincon Valley Union School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- A.B.C. Federation of Teachers v. A.B.C. Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Plumbing, Heating & Piping Employers Council v. QuillinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Santos v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cerini v. City of CloverdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Wang v. Division of Labor Standards EnforcementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Marlow v. Orange County Human Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- La Pointe v. John K.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.