Legal Opinion

Van Horne v. Watrous

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1895No. 1475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

The court below sustained the general demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint. The plaintiffs elected to stand upon their complaint and judgment was rendered dismissing the action and for costs.

Respondents’ motion to dismiss was not well taken. Pacific Supply Co. v. Brand, 7 Wash. 357 (35 Pac. 72), was decided upon a different state of facts. In that case there was no standing upon the pleading, but the plaintiff was given time to amend. That was the only record there was in the case.

The complaint here shows that appellant Van Horne and *526one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Supply Co. v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Godfrey v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. State, ex rel. Shenk v. LungIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Zindorf Construction Co. v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API